Architect the Philosopher:
theory and policy of architecture
The articles in this SAJ issue once more problemitize the relation between architecture and theory of architecture. Could we claim that following the great “closeness” between philosophy and architecture in the eighties and the nineties, and the sudden chilling and distancing of the architects and the philosophers in the recent years, it might be possible to re-examine the relation between the theory and architectural praxis?
In which way the architects presently, during the first decade of the 21st century, formulate their work thematically and how do the philosophers (philosophers or philosophy?!) assist them in it? How do the philosophers as the architects ponder upon and how do they cogitate architecture as philosophers?
It seems, and the articles of the architects and the philosophers presented to us manifest that the best, that the architects have finally discovered their independent speculative expression in respect to philosophers, thereby producing their own philosophy. Thus, in a certain manner, the engagement of the philosophers, namely philosophy, has finally been incorporated in the work and the role of the architect in the community.
DOES ANYBODY NEED ARCHITECTURAL THEORY ANY LONGER?
ARCHITECTURE AND NEW ONTOLOGIES
JACQUES DERRIDA AND THE POLITICS OF ARCHITECTURE
SOCIAL THEORY AND ARCHITECTURE
Vera Backović, Ljubomir Maširević